Alabama State
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,374  Artrailia Lesane JR 22:01
1,464  Paige Rankine JR 22:07
1,814  Shantia Wilson JR 22:29
2,034  Santina Williams JR 22:45
2,039  Tatiana Etienne JR 22:45
2,220  Shakalia Williams JR 22:59
2,614  Brandee Ebert JR 23:38
2,716  Sade Lavallias SO 23:52
2,882  Hayley Spears SO 24:19
3,008  Markia Bartley JR 24:48
National Rank #237 of 339
South Region Rank #27 of 46
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 29th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.3%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Artrailia Lesane Paige Rankine Shantia Wilson Santina Williams Tatiana Etienne Shakalia Williams Brandee Ebert Sade Lavallias Hayley Spears Markia Bartley
Greater Louisville Classic (Silver) 10/03 1296 22:06 22:42 23:15 22:46 22:38 23:07 23:23 23:49 24:52 25:13
Alabama Crimson Classic Invitational 10/16 1305 21:51 21:37 22:11 23:48 23:03 24:10 24:02 24:27
SWAC Championships 10/24 1262 22:08 21:39 22:19 22:48 22:24 23:05 23:32 23:47 24:56
South Region Championships 11/13 1304 22:08 23:08 22:43 22:43 22:49 24:13 23:49





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 28.3 805 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 2.0 3.6 6.8 10.1 12.6 14.7 16.7 14.9 8.5



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Artrailia Lesane 129.0
Paige Rankine 137.0
Shantia Wilson 168.6
Santina Williams 186.7
Tatiana Etienne 186.8
Shakalia Williams 200.7
Brandee Ebert 231.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 0.0% 0.0 17
18 0.0% 0.0 18
19 0.1% 0.1 19
20 0.2% 0.2 20
21 0.4% 0.4 21
22 0.8% 0.8 22
23 2.0% 2.0 23
24 3.6% 3.6 24
25 6.8% 6.8 25
26 10.1% 10.1 26
27 12.6% 12.6 27
28 14.7% 14.7 28
29 16.7% 16.7 29
30 14.9% 14.9 30
31 8.5% 8.5 31
32 4.8% 4.8 32
33 2.2% 2.2 33
34 1.1% 1.1 34
35 0.4% 0.4 35
36 0.1% 0.1 36
37 0.1% 0.1 37
38 0.0% 0.0 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0